A typical engagement audits your current exposure across infrastructure, applications and access, hardens the gaps by priority, sets up monitoring and alerting for suspicious activity, and produces a rehearsed incident response plan covering the DPDP Act's breach notification obligations.
Basics first, sophistication later
Most successful attacks on organisations of this size are not sophisticated. They exploit an unpatched server, a reused password without multi-factor authentication, an exposed database, or a phishing email nobody was trained to spot. Advanced tooling bought before those are fixed is money spent on the wrong layer.
So we work in order of what actually gets exploited: access control and MFA, patching, exposure reduction, backup integrity, then monitoring and detection. Unglamorous, and it closes the paths attackers actually use.
Process
How we deliver it
Process flow for Cybersecurity & threat detection
01
Audit
Infrastructure, applications, access and third-party exposure.
02
Prioritise by risk
Ranked by likelihood and impact, not by tool category.
Stack decisions follow the problem. This is where we usually start, not a fixed menu.
Frequently asked
Questions we get about this
Is a penetration test the same as a security audit?
No. A penetration test attempts to exploit specific systems and tells you what an attacker could reach. An audit reviews configuration, access, processes and exposure more broadly. Most organisations get more value from the audit first, then a penetration test once the obvious gaps are closed.
What are our obligations if we are breached?
Under the DPDP Act 2023, personal data breaches must be notified to the Data Protection Board and to affected individuals. The practical difficulty is detecting and scoping a breach quickly enough to report accurately, which is why monitoring and a rehearsed plan matter more than the policy document.
Talk it through before you commit
A discovery call is a working session on your constraint, not a sales pitch.
