Consulting

Technology advisory

Architecture, build-versus-buy and vendor decisions — argued in writing, so the reasoning survives the people who made it.

What does a technology advisor do?

A technology advisor helps make and document consequential technical decisions: whether to build or buy, which vendor or platform to select, how systems should fit together, and what the trade-offs of each option actually are. The output is a defensible decision with the reasoning recorded.

Undocumented decisions get relitigated

Every organisation has a system nobody can explain the choice of. The people who decided have left, the constraints they were working under are forgotten, and the team relitigates it annually without new information.

Writing the decision down — options considered, criteria applied, trade-offs accepted, assumptions made — costs an afternoon and saves that argument for years. It also makes it obvious when an assumption has changed and the decision genuinely should be revisited.

Process

How we deliver it

1Frame the decisionWhat is actually beingdecided, and what constrainsit.2Generate optionsIncluding the option ofdoing nothing.3Set criteriaWeighted, agreed beforeevaluation rather thanafter.4EvaluateAgainst criteria, withtrade-offs stated plainly.5DocumentA decision record capturingreasoning and assumptions.
Process flow for Technology advisory
  1. 01

    Frame the decision

    What is actually being decided, and what constrains it.

  2. 02

    Generate options

    Including the option of doing nothing.

  3. 03

    Set criteria

    Weighted, agreed before evaluation rather than after.

  4. 04

    Evaluate

    Against criteria, with trade-offs stated plainly.

  5. 05

    Document

    A decision record capturing reasoning and assumptions.

Deliverables

What you receive

  • Options analysis with weighted criteria
  • Cost modelling across build, buy and hybrid paths
  • A clear recommendation with trade-offs stated
  • Architecture decision record for the repository
  • Presentation to stakeholders with the reasoning open to challenge

Engagement shape

Two to six weeks per decision, or a retained advisory arrangement for ongoing questions.

Tooling

What we typically build with

  • Architecture review
  • Total cost of ownership modelling
  • Vendor evaluation frameworks
  • Decision records

Stack decisions follow the problem. This is where we usually start, not a fixed menu.

Frequently asked

Questions we get about this

Are you independent of the vendors you evaluate?

Yes. We hold no reseller agreements or referral commissions, which is deliberate — it is the only way an evaluation is worth anything. Where we could plausibly deliver the build ourselves, we say so explicitly in the report.

Build or buy?

Buy where the capability is common and your requirements are ordinary; build where the process is a genuine differentiator or licensing at your scale exceeds the build. The honest answer is buy more often than technology teams instinctively prefer.

Talk it through before you commit

A discovery call is a working session on your constraint, not a sales pitch.

Quick inquiry

Tell us what you're trying to build

A short note is enough. You'll hear back from the team, not a bot — usually within one working day.

Captcha challenge