Engineering

QA & test automation

Automated suites that catch regressions before your users do, so releasing stops being an event the team dreads.

What does test automation achieve?

Test automation runs a suite of checks against your application on every change, catching regressions within minutes instead of during manual testing or after release. It makes frequent releases safe, which is what allows a team to ship improvements weekly rather than quarterly.

Coverage is not the goal

Chasing a coverage percentage produces thousands of brittle tests that break on every refactor and get disabled within a year. The useful measure is different: are the paths that would cost you money if broken — checkout, login, submission, payment — covered by tests that fail loudly and rarely lie?

We start with those paths, keep the suite fast enough that developers actually run it, and treat a flaky test as a bug to fix rather than a nuisance to rerun. A suite people ignore is worse than no suite, because it manufactures false confidence.

Process

How we deliver it

1Identify critical pathsThe journeys whose failurecosts money or trust.2Build the core suiteEnd-to-end tests on thosepaths first.3Wire into CIEvery pull request testedautomatically before merge.4Add depthAPI, integration,performance and securitychecks.5MaintainFix flakiness immediately;keep run time short.
Process flow for QA & test automation
  1. 01

    Identify critical paths

    The journeys whose failure costs money or trust.

  2. 02

    Build the core suite

    End-to-end tests on those paths first.

  3. 03

    Wire into CI

    Every pull request tested automatically before merge.

  4. 04

    Add depth

    API, integration, performance and security checks.

  5. 05

    Maintain

    Fix flakiness immediately; keep run time short.

Deliverables

What you receive

  • An automated test suite covering the critical journeys
  • CI integration blocking merges on failure
  • Performance baseline and load test results
  • Test reporting visible to the whole team
  • Documentation for writing and maintaining new tests

Engagement shape

Six to twelve weeks to establish a suite, then maintained alongside feature work rather than as a separate project.

Tooling

What we typically build with

  • Playwright
  • Cypress
  • Jest
  • PyTest
  • GitHub Actions
  • k6
  • OWASP ZAP

Stack decisions follow the problem. This is where we usually start, not a fixed menu.

Frequently asked

Questions we get about this

Is this worth it for a small team?

It depends on release frequency and failure cost. A small team shipping weekly benefits enormously. A team shipping twice a year with a careful manual process may not. We would rather scope a focused suite on three critical journeys than sell a full programme you will not maintain.

Can you test our existing application?

Yes. Adding tests to an existing codebase is common and we start from the outside — end-to-end tests through the interface — which requires no refactoring to get value quickly.

Talk it through before you commit

A discovery call is a working session on your constraint, not a sales pitch.

Quick inquiry

Tell us what you're trying to build

A short note is enough. You'll hear back from the team, not a bot — usually within one working day.

Captcha challenge